All the crap which fills up my email – direct to you the consumer
This little bird dares to break the rules! Beautiful irony!
Tags: bird, humor, Pics
Does the sign mean that I can’t walk my bird here? Or is that sign for the birds?
why can’t the sign say don’t feed the birds if thats what it is trying to state.
Dare to Break the Rules – Pic…
would be nice, if it were not shopped. compare the silhouette/sign with the bird: exactly the same, only differ in size.
See it’s not speaking in a language that seagulls understand. That sign is essentially there to tell people “don’t bring your seagulls here” similar to a no dogs or no old-people sign.
If you want seagulls to understand it then you need to have a picture of a cat… or a bigger seagull, or whatever it is that seagulls are scared of. An albatross maybe, or a massive spider.
Looks photoshopped to me
Ha ha, cheeky bird
Why don’t we assess the material difference it would make to our lives if this wasn’t photoshopped… oh wait, it makes no difference at all.
It’s just a funny picture, so who cares if it’s shopped or not???
Would have been even better if the bird was also flipping “the bird”…
stupid birds, can’t even read.
[...] Dare to Break the Rules – All Of The Crap They Send Me: All the crap which fills up my email – direc… [...]
Now that’s funny SHIT
[...] http://www.allofthecrap.com/9/dare-to-break-the-rules/ [...]
okay, i know its a great pic but come on, its got to be photoshoped! … And i’m not the type to go around claiming it’s fake but just compare the real seagull to the silhouette version on the sign, it’s almost 100% the same. How rare to capture the same bird in this moment. Maybe the seagull modeled for the sign creators and the seagull knows it.
I know this is so cliche, but looking at the birds feet, it looks kinda photoshopped…
“This little bird dares to break the rules! Beautiful irony!”
its not ironic, but just coincidence. fyi.
[...] read more | digg story [...]
shopped for sure …
[...] Бросая вызов правилам allofthecrap.com [...]
that is so photoshop. the bird and the logo has the exact same shape. and who would make that kind of sign… birds can’t read it. but i have to say its well done and very funny.
i think this is fake…??
I can tell because of some of the pixels and having seen quite a few shops in my time!
I can tell its shopped by the pixels. I’ve seen a lot on shops in my day.
the sign says “photoshopped.” I can tell by some of the pixels and seeing quite a few shops in my day.
it seems unlikely that a bird identical to the one outlined on the sign would land there in the exact same position. photoshop
[...] Posted December 8th @ 10:17 pm by The Internet Journalist And dare to break the rules… [...]
haha..thanks for sharing..whether the pic is real or fake..
Yeah, the silhouette is identical to the real bird… even down to the unusually wobbly feet.
Nice idea, but photoshopped.
[...] Bird has the right idea.read more | digg story addthis_url = ‘http%3A%2F%2Ftechandamusingstuff.com%2F%3Fp%3D392′; addthis_title = [...]
ha-ha – very funny pic
Why do you sayit is photoshopped??? Think about it: Would not the dark silhouette (the picture on the sign) of a seagull would look (gasp)….like a seagull???
Oh, how crazy that would be!
Something has to be real for it to be funny. Like the Simpsons.
oyehx ofymqnv iruhcw bxrzh xmiv oqemvu fqwv
[...] Agorism in action? On a less serious note, this is definitely some audacious civil disobedience. [...]
WHO CARES IF IT’S PHOTOSHOPPED? Good lord, folks. It’s like you’re pointing at a movie screen at a theater and saying “They’re actors!”.
Enjoy with games
우와 우와 우와 우와 우와
Wow wow wow wow wow
[...] Dare to Break the Rules. Photo says it all. (via digg) image from allofthecrap.com You might also like… • PIC: The wrong time to feed a kangaroo • N.D. Tries to Break Snow Angel Record • The Best Arrest Photo Ever? [...]
[...] via [...]
I love that you put excellent content out that is articulate and good-written.
Thank you, I have recently been looking for information about this topic for a while and yours is the best I have found out so far.
However, what concerning the conclusion? Are you sure in regards
to the supply?
Mail (will not be published)